HortResearch Publication - How do Rootstocks Affect Canopy Development?
There is a close interaction between the root system and the canopy of the plant. The canopy produces carbohydrate to sustain and develop the plant, while the roots provide nutrients and water. One of the most important aspects of plant growth is the constant ratio maintained between the root system and canopy of the plant. Therefore the size of the root system and its level of activity is always proportional to the mass of shoots and their activity.
Any scion/rootstock combination has a specific root:shoot ratio and artificial attempts to modify this, by either shoot or root pruning, results in the plant changing its growth pattern in order to re-establish the balance. This means that pruning, which is necessary to control tree size and productivity, works against the natural growth habit of the tree. Valuable reserves which could be used to produce high quality fruit are used up maintaining the root:shoot ratio.
Interactions between rootstocks and scions occur both through the exchange of resources like water, nutrients and carbohydrate and also via hormonal messengers. The physical union between a rootstock and scion, or its degree of compatibility, influences the exchange of these materials and to a certain extent affects the relationship between scion and rootstock.
Citranges are now amongst the most important citrus rootstocks in the world, and six different selections have been included in rootstock evaluation trials at Kerikeri for satsumas and lemons. Further rootstock and scion combinations are also being trialled but all trials are in their infancy, and results will only be available in the year 2000. In order to examine the effects of rootstocks more closely we have studied the physiology of mature Silverhill satsuma mandarin trees on either Troyer citrange or Poncirus trifoliata rootstocks. The preliminary results from this trial presented in this article demonstrate the range of effects rootstocks can have on canopy development.
| Rootstock | Tree Height (m) |
Tree Width (m) |
Canopy Volume (m3) |
Yield (kg/tree) |
Mean Fruit Weight |
Yield Efficiency (kg/m3) |
| Troyer | 2.8 | 3.4 | 22.7 | 80.6 | 47 | 3.5 |
| Trifoliata | 2.3 | 3.0 | 10.8 | 45.8 | 49 | 4.2 |
Trees on the less vigorous trifoliata rootstock had a lower canopy volume with less non-productive wood and therefore have a higher yield efficiency (Table 1). However trees on Troyer citrange rootstocks still produce more fruit per hectare. If trees were pruned to minimise the amount of shaded non-productive wood, yields and fruit quality could be lifted further. The higher yield efficiency and low vigour of trees on Trifoliata is an advantage in high-density planting systems.
Figure 2: Bud break and flowering of Silverhill satsuma mandarins on two rootstocks
The appearance and maturity of fruit was also influenced by the rootstock (Figure 3). Fruit from trees on Troyer citrange coloured and reached minimum internal maturity standards earlier than those from trees on trifoliata.
In 1993, fruit from trees on Troyer rootstocks reached the minimum local market Brix:acid ratio of 7.0 one week earlier and in 1994 fruit were three weeks earlier (Figure 4). This enhanced fruit maturity was a result of both higher brix and lower acid levels.
Differences in canopy and fruit development of trees on the two rootstocks demonstrates their different sensitivity to environmental triggers like soil and air temperature. There is also evidence that rootstocks can influence tree water relations.
Figure 3: Fruit from trees on Troyer citrange mature earlier than those on trifoliata
Leaves from trees on trifoliata rootstocks had higher magnesium and calcium levels, but lower phosphate and potassium levels than trees on Troyer rootstocks. It appears that calcium and potassium levels are inversely related (Figure 5a). Of the key trace elements, only boron was significantly affected by the choice of rootstock. Trees on trifoliata roots had consistently higher leaf boron levels than those with Troyer roots (Figure 5b).
These differences highlight one of the problems that can occur when interpreting leaf nutrient levels. Generally leaf nutrient levels from trees on both rootstocks fell within the optimal range. One exception was potassium levels which were optimal in trees with Troyer stocks but deficient in trees with trifoliata rootstocks. This demonstrates the need for care in interpreting leaf nutrient analyses as many factors including the choice of rootstock and scion can affect results.
Figure 4: Brix:acid ratio of fruit from trees on two rootstocks for 1993 and 1994
In our study we have measured differences in the amount of starch and other carbohydrate reserves stored in plant organs. Preliminary results show that trees with trifoliata as a rootstock had higher starch reserves in the stem and branches but lower levels in the roots than-trees with Troyer rootstocks. These results must now be correlated to tree development and fruit production.
In this study we have demonstrated that Troyer citrange significantly improved in tree vigour and yield as well as altering the development and nutrition of a Silverhill satsuma mandarin scion. This article suggests that Troyer citrange could prove an interesting stock for satsuma mandarins.
Source: The Orchardist, November 1994